This might seem somewhat counterintuitive as we know the test is quite accurate. The point is that the disease is also very rare. Thus, there are two competing forces here, and since the rareness of the disease (1 out of 10,000) is stronger than the accuracy of the test (98 or 99 percent), there is still good chance that the person does not have the disease.
Another way to think about this problem is illustrated in the tree diagram in Figure . Suppose 1 million people get tested for the disease. Out of the one million people, about 100 of them have the disease, while the other 999,900 do not have the disease. Out of the 100 people who have the disease 100×=99 people will have positive test results. However, out of the people who do not have the disease 999,900×.02=19998
999,900 ×=19998 people will have positive test results. Thus in total there are 19998 people with positive test results, and only 99 of them actually have the disease. Therefore, the probability that a person from the “positive test result“ group actually have the disease is
P(D|T)=99/9919998 99=
The Problem:
A certain disease affects about 1 out of 10,000 people. There is a test to check whether the person has the disease. The test is quite accurate. In particular, we know that
the probability that the test result is positive (suggesting the person has the disease), given that the person does not have the disease, is only 2 percent;
the probability that the test result is negative (suggesting the person does not have the disease), given that the person has the disease, is only 1 percent.
A random person gets tested for the disease and the result comes back positive. What is the probability that the person has the disease?
#BayesRuleFalsePositiveParadox #BayesRule #FalsePositiveParadox #probability #statistics #Genetics #BayesTheorem #BayesLaw #NikolaysGeneticsLessons #Calculus #education #math #solution #Conditional #bayes #Theorem #BayesianInference #veritasium #bayesTheorem #rule #prior #conditionProbability #thomasBayes #bayesRule #bayesian #inference #mathematics #treeDiagrams #vennDiagrams #lawOfProbability
1 view
56
17
7 years ago 00:51:11 133
2. Conditioning and Bayes’ Rule
7 years ago 00:48:53 21
10. Continuous Bayes’ Rule; Derived Distributions
4 years ago 00:21:14 14
The medical test paradox: Can redesigning Bayes rule help?
2 years ago 00:09:51 1
Bayes’ Rule: False Positive Paradox
6 years ago 00:10:08 6
Probability for Machine Learning | 6b Bayes’ rule example
8 years ago 00:13:34 1
Game Theory 101 (#71): Bayes’ Rule
2 years ago 00:19:08 1
How to systematically approach truth - Bayes’ rule
4 years ago 00:34:04 1
Supercharging Decision Making with Bayes
4 years ago 00:10:37 1
How To Update Your Beliefs Systematically - Bayes’ Theorem
2 years ago 00:13:05 1
How to solve genetics problems using Bayes’ theorem
2 years ago 00:34:05 1
How to Solve Genetics Problems Using Bayes Theorem
2 years ago 00:17:14 1
How to solve pedigree problems (Bayes theorem) 8
3 years ago 00:04:01 1
Deep Measurement Updates for Bayes Filters - ICRA 2022 presentation
4 years ago 00:02:03 1
Catholics Flee From Viet-Minh Rule (1954)
12 years ago 00:07:29 51
Kings Of Convenience: Boat Behind / Rule My World (Laneway Festival Singapore 2013)
11 months ago 00:05:14 1
Bay Area officials react to SCOTUS ruling on homelessness ordinances
11 years ago 00:00:21 548
Bill Maher - New Rules - Shity By The Bay (Русский перевод)
1 year ago 00:11:58 2
To Rule Them All: RadioMaster MT12 Unboxing & Rough Testing with RC CAR Jeep Cherokee - Winch
4 years ago 00:06:54 2
VEGAN PHO RECIPE TO RULE THEM ALL | VIETNAMESE SOUP NOODLE FUH CHAY BROTH (Phở)
13 years ago 00:04:11 69
Madonna The Power of Goodbye Official HD Madonna Rules
2 years ago 00:04:05 28
Weird Maretime Bay
8 months ago 00:06:06 1
‘Russian Spy’ Whale Hvaldimir ‘Shot Dead’? Animal Rights Groups Say ‘Can’t Rule Out Criminal Act’
1 year ago 01:13:40 24
Prophecy Of Children & Babies Ruling The Headlines
4 years ago 00:00:28 2
Правило чтения ay, ai [eɪ]. Reading rule ay, ai [eɪ]