Ben vs Entire NASA Climate Team

Ben vs NASA Climate Website Team [Round 2] 1) They focused on Laschamp, cosmic rays and climate change. I did not. I corrected their focus on Laschamp (well, apparently not), focused on SOLAR forcing, and climate change was only half of the story. 2) They cherrypicked articles that did not reflect a total treatment of the field- old articles that do not at all represent the current state of the science. The current state is what I showed, with more papers, newer papers, and the inclusion of broader perspectives on cosmic ray atmospheric electrification, the solar part in climate forcing, and the biosphere risk of a magnetic excursion. 3) NASA ignored numerous critical aspects of my initial response video/letter. The parts they addressed were insufficient, old, often incorrect, confusing, and indicative of their failure to grasp the simple theme of an argument. Note: Their letter is being copied/pasted to everyone who mentions our initial response to them. They did NOT send a copy to me. Round 1: NASA’s O