Trump Lawyers Embarrass Jack Smith In Scathing Brief: ‘Would Flunk First-Grade Math’

Trump Lawyers Embarrass Jack Smith In Scathing Brief: ‘Would Flunk First-Grade Math’ For Latest News:- In this scathing thirty-seven-page legal brief, the prison crew representing former President Donald J. Trump meticulously dismantles the feeble defense of Judge Tanya Chutkan’s gag order by Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution team. Trump’s attorneys assert that the argument “fails at every step“ and defies First Amendment doctrines. Citing thirty-three cases dating back to 1959, they argue the unconstitutional order places a judge as a barrier between Trump and the nation. The document exposes “glaring evidentiary gaps“ and accuses Smith’s team of relying on hearsay media reports. Trump’s team contends the gag order violates fundamental First Amendment principles, including campaign speech importance and the audience’s right to listen. They vehemently reject the prosecution’s attempt to silence public criticism and emphasize that criminal investigations don’t suspend First Amendment protection. The prosecution’s reliance on a parallel gag order in New York is debunked, and the brief concludes by asserting that restricting a political figure with over 100 million followers fails basic math and Supreme Court precedent, emphasizing that Trump’s campaign speech cannot be micromanaged by the court or prosecution. #TrumpLegalTeam #GagOrderChallenge #FirstAmendmentRights #LegalBrief #JusticeSystem #FreeSpeech #ConstitutionalRights #PoliticalSpeech #LegalDefense #ProsecutionFail #CriminalInvestigation #SupremeCourtPrecedent #MediaReports #CampaignSpeech #PublicCriticism #LegalArgument #FreeExpression #PresidentialCandidate #LegalAnalysis #DefendingDemocracy #ConstitutionalPrinciples #LegalVictory #Trump2024 #LegalBattle #LegalProceedings #FirstAmendmentProtection #JudicialReview #PoliticalDebate We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite Global News Tracker.