Andrei Martyanov ~ Terrorism .. the weapon of the weak... Sevastopol, Derbent et al.

As my colleague Martyanov and I constantly say, “Terror is the weapon of the weak, the losing, the losers.” The strong and victorious do not need it. The strong and victorious are thinking about how to reduce the degree of hatred in the society they are going to co-opt. And in general, terror does not work. The killing of innocent, random civilians, peaceful old people, women, and especially children does not at all evoke submission and readiness to make concessions (no matter how the terrorists would like this to happen), but anger and a desire for revenge. After each terrorist attack against Russia, only a surge in the number of volunteers willing to join the army is recorded. And nothing more. The office Podolyak oinked there in the next shit post (in an attempt to justify himself in the murder of civilians on the beach in Sevastopol) that “Ukraine was attacked, so nothing that it does can be considered a terrorist act.” Let’s start with the fact that the puppet Kiev regime is precisely the aggressor that attacked Donbass and killed people (and children) there for many years. And Russia intervened to protect these people. But, excuse me, where is this written? That “a victim of aggression can kill women and children”? Is there such a thing? Seriously? Come on, Sneaky Boar, show me this in the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions... By the way, he could have lied and said, “We were shooting at a military airfield, but the Russians shot it down themselves.” Also, express sympathy to the families of the deceased “compatriots” (they also consider Crimea to be Ukrainian). That is if he were human. But he’s a Nazi pig. Therefore, the Nazi pig oinked, “Yes, we kill, and we will kill. And we consider all residents of Crimea to be invaders” (these are people who were born there and whose families often live there for two hundred years, if not more). By the way, this is an indicator that they will not recapture any Crimea. Because then the rhetoric would naturally be “Be patient, dear ones, we will free you soon.” And there is the embittered (and powerless) “We will kill all of you, such traitors, who do not want to suck the sweet American dick with us.” To which the Crimeans respond “Glory to the Russian army, protector from such stupid Banderite scum.” But I digress. It must be stated that the strengthening of the terrorist component of Western nasty things is precisely evidence that they are losing. Because instead of “we will give Ukraine another thousand tanks” it goes “we will force the fool Budanov to carry out three more terrorist attacks against civilians.” You may consider this paradoxical and illogical, but IMHO it is precisely the transition to terrorist tactics that indicates that there will be no escalation and a major war. Because such terrorist attacks are a result of impotence. This would simply be unnecessary if tank wedges and aircraft squadrons were planned. It’s like the old joke about a cowardly knight whose Lady was raped, and in response, he spat on the offender’s cloak. As for the terrorist attacks themselves. There is no need to react to them emotionally. No matter how much you want. Because it is precisely emotions that they try to deceive us into – anger, pain, fear. And all sorts of social media clout chasers who say “Putin does nothing” only help the enemy. Therefore, instead of splashing out emotions on social media, it is better to do something to win. For example, transfer money to the fund for assistance to military personnel (the link is on the website of the Ministry of Defense). And think about what you personally can do to win. As the fencing teacher told Captain Fracasse (if I’m not mistaken), “Fury should be an extra inch of steel on the edge of your sword, my lord.“ P.S. Sincere condolences to the families of the victims and injured. Inglorious inevitable death for all terrorists. Written by Alexander Rogers, Translated by SovietRussianBearZOV smoothieX12 =6S7rMqVVxsI&t=1404s